Archive for category Cool Stuff

Mike Da Mustang [Video]

This is clearly meant for kids but I still find it awesome. Lots of adult aviation references in there too. Enjoy episode one!


What do you think of this post?
Awesome (1) Interesting (0) Useful (0) Boring (0) Sucks (0)

, , ,

No Comments

1920 Flight Test Requirements

I came across this link a while ago and am just getting around to posting it. The scan is from Smith’s Falls Flying Club’s website and details the requirements of obtaining a PPL in 1920’s Canada. The test is conducted solo with the examiner watching from the ground.

Although there are way more requirements these days, at least you don’t have to shut the engine off at 5,000′ and glide to a spot landing within 300′ of your mark! Enjoy this tidbit of Canadian aviation history…


Click to enlarge

Credit: Smith’s Falls Flying Club

What do you think of this post?
Awesome (0) Interesting (1) Useful (0) Boring (0) Sucks (0)

, ,

No Comments

Funny Approach Fixes

I found a great series of approach fixes into Portsmouth International today. Being a huge Bugs Bunny fan, this one is pretty awesome.

In order, it reads: ITAWT ITAWA PUDYE TTATT —> IDEED.

What do you think of this post?
Awesome (1) Interesting (1) Useful (0) Boring (0) Sucks (0)

, ,

No Comments

Tribute to Northwest 188 [Video]

Credit goes to Doug for finding this one.

What do you think of this post?
Awesome (1) Interesting (3) Useful (0) Boring (0) Sucks (0)

, ,

No Comments

Landing in YXU [Video]

I took a video a while back of myself approaching London, joining the circuit, and landing. It’s nothing terribly exciting and you may want to just skip ahead to when I get into the circuit, but I thought I would post it anyways. The video is from my iPhone so you won’t find any HD or HQ buttons on youtube.

The yawing at the end is actually a slip – I was a bit higher than I’d liked. You’ll also hear the stall horn go off just as I start the flare. Wasn’t a bad landing at all if I do say so. Opinions?

What do you think of this post?
Awesome (0) Interesting (0) Useful (0) Boring (0) Sucks (0)

, , , , ,

No Comments

The Sticky Note Method

One of the first things you learn as a pilot is that a good landing stems from a good approach. In the jet world, pilots aim for a stabilized approach whereby the pilot configures the aircraft to travel at a certain airspeed and rate of descent straight down to the threshold. I recently read an article (that I can’t seem to find anymore) stating that the term “stabilize” really didn’t apply to a prop driven aircraft. The reason being that jet engines have an inherent lag between adding power in the cockpit and seeing that throttle movement translate into actual power. Jet engines need time to spool up if they are idling and pilots may not have this time if they need to execute a missed approach. Thus, power is left on during the approach to help reduce the lag time if a spool up to full power is ever needed.

In the prop world, the article suggests that the term “collected” is more appropriate. We want to configure the pitch and power settings so that we’re descending at an optimal rate, and at an optimal speed, as outlined in the aircraft’s operating handbook. So how do we know exactly what power setting to use and exactly how many degrees of nose down pitch to apply in order to touch down at a certain point on the runway which could be miles and miles ahead of us? For a lot of people, it’s simply a matter of using your gut feeling to configure the aircraft when it feels right. We have a mental picture of what things should look like at certain times and distances from our waypoint and based off these pictures, we act accordingly. This is how I’ve always set up my approaches and it’s how we usually learn. However, I recently learned of a pretty easy way to guarantee hitting your landing target that takes all of the guesswork out of approaches. Some may call it by another name, but I have dubbed it “The Sticky Note Method”.

Imagine that you’re coming to the end of a long cross country flight and you’re ten miles out. Tower clears you to a straight in – Runway 33. Using this method, you’ll be able to hit your target every time… even from ten miles away. Here’s how it works.

What you’ll need: a few sticky notes and the inside of the windshield should be nice and clean. On a day when you can take a plane up and just practice your flying, trim the airplane in straight and level flight. Reduce power so that you maintain straight and level flight, but your airspeed should be exactly the same as it is on final approach. Configure the airplane how you would normally (ie. full flap, gear down if applicable, etc). Use the minimum amount of power possible to keep the airplane at this desired speed and straight and level. Make sure you’re trimmed out.

Take a sticky note and tear off a small amount from the adhesive part (the top). Place this little dot on the windshield in front of you so that when you’re sitting normally in your seat, the dot sits right at the level of the horizon. This may take a few tries as you probably won’t get it right on the first try. Keep readjusting the dot until the stickiness wears off, or you get it right. As best you can, try and memorize this position on the windshield. For practice sake, leave the sticky there while you shoot some approaches and test this theory out.

Let’s get back to our situation. You’re on final and a ways back from the runway. Once you reduce power and start your descent, pitch the airplane in order to move this dot over the spot on the runway where you want to start your flare. Keep in mind that your touchdown point will be beyond this point, so based on your aircraft’s characteristics, place the dot however many hundred feet before your touchdown point you deem necessary. The spot on the ground that is covered by the dot represents where the aircraft would travel into the ground should you leave the aircraft in its collected state and never start your flare. The trick to keeping the aircraft on course is to never adjust your pitch and only adjust your power. Your pitch should always keep the dot over the same place on the runway that you’re aiming for. You will adjust your power to control airspeed. This is contrary to how you’re taught when you first learned to fly. Power controls altitude, pitch controls airspeed.

So assuming you keep your pitch steady with the dot over your aiming point, and you adjust power to maintain optimum approach speed, and assuming you correctly placed the sticky on the horizon when you first set this little test up, you should be starting your flare exactly where you planned.

I have to admit that I was skeptical at first. And I know I sound like I’m selling something on an infomercial, but this really does work. My instructor and I were given a 7 mile final – straight in with lots of time to test this method. We set it up exactly how I described it, and what do you know, I hit my flare point +100 feet. It wasn’t perfect, but from 7 miles away, 100 feet is pretty accurate in my mind. We did a few more circuits and confirmed that it works just as well from close in than it did from far away.

Now obviously you’re not going to fly with a sticky note on your windshield every time you go flying. This method helps you understand the principle of a collected/stabilized approach and how to fly them with greater accuracy. With practice, you’ll know exactly where that spot is on your windshield without the sticky even being there.

A cheaper way to test this out would be to do the exact same thing, but in a sim. Just place the sticky note on the computer screen’s horizon and shoot some virtual approaches. I think you’ll end up finding it’s pretty accurate there too. In fact, you may want to test this out on a computer before you even go flying.

I’m interested in finding out if other people out there have tried this, and to what avail. It’s certainly an interesting technique to try out and I want to hear some feedback if you’ve got any. Also, any other techniques/tricks that you might use regularly and want to share would be most welcome.

What do you think of this post?
Awesome (0) Interesting (0) Useful (0) Boring (0) Sucks (0)

, ,

No Comments

iPhone + MotionX GPS + Night Flying

I was recently offered an internship position with the government as a part of my university’s internship program. In a nut shell, I take a year off of school between my third and fourth year to work. I get real world work experience, a decent wage (being a government position) and a new reference to put on my resume. It’s not a bad deal at all, and I get a year off school to work on my commercial license too.. :)

Due to my recently secured position with the Canadian government, I felt I could indulge myself in a new tech purchase. I’d owned an iPod Touch for a year and had always loved using it for anything I could when it came to flying: log book (LogTen Mobile), METAR/TAFs (AeroWeather), E6B Calculations (PilotWiz) and of course my own app for checking crosswinds (xWind)

The one thing the iPod Touch lacked was a GPS chip. So, on June 19, when the new iPhone 3GS came out, I went to my local Fido store and splurged on a new 16Gb black iPhone. I promptly did some research on the best GPS apps and came across Fullpower’s MotionX app. You can click on the link and read a bit about it, but I’ll give you the quick summary of features here: waypoint creation, multiple navigation modes, altitude and groundspeed readout, ETA readout, choice of OpenStreetMap or Google Maps, compass, music integration, and the ability to record your routes and export them in a few formats. With all of these features, I was skeptical as to how well they would all work for a $3 app. So, on a recent flight to Toronto City Center (CYTZ), I put this app through its paces. Turns out it does a pretty darn good job.

I turned on the the stopwatch feature within MotionX when I was done my run-up and let it start recording my position, speed, and altitude at every step along my flight. I departed runway 33 and made my turn eastbound following the 074ยบ radial outbound to towards Toronto. Once clear of the London class D, I called Toronto Centre for flight following and told them I was just looking for a sightseeing tour of downtown Toronto, at which point I would turn around and come home. I needed 2.1 more hours of night PIC time for my night rating so it seemed like a sensible route.

The great thing about MotionX is that you can export your saved routes in GPX format which is supported by many open source plug-ins and applications. I managed to find one called XML Google Maps for WordPress which allows me to show you my route and also my altitude and speed profiles. If you look below, you’ll see my route in blue departing runway 33 to the north, then turning east and heading to Toronto. The blue waypoint markers are laid out every 10NM along the route for reference. Toronto Centre cleared me to intercept the shoreline around Oakville and call City Center tower to enter their airspace. I knew there was a NOTAM out for YTZ that had an airspace closure around Humber Bay due to July 4 fireworks. I don’t really know why we had fireworks for an American holiday, but it was still a pretty cool to see from the air!

If you follow my route to the west side of Humber Bay, you’ll see that I circle a few times while watching the fireworks and then head back west along the shoreline. I climbed back up to 4500′ and headed home. One of the cool things about the GPX file that I exported was the altitude and speed profiles that the XML Google Maps plugin allowed me to generate. You’ll notice that at the beginning of the flight, my flight plan called for a 5500′ cruising altitude eastbound (conforming with cruising altitude orders of course). Toronto Center stepped me down to 2000′ when I was circling watching the fireworks to keep me under any Toronto Pearson IFR traffic coming and going from our nations busiest airport. You can then see my climb, and subsequently the number of miles it took to climb 2500′ back to cruising at 4500′: about 10NM.

Last but not least, the speed profile. Now you might notice a little spike in the middle of the profile that reaches about 400 knots. This is obviously an error within the app and I noticed that the speed was the least reliable performance measure during the flight. It fluctuates a lot but you can still average out the speeds and find that I was cruising at about 120-130 knots groundspeed eastbound and a bit slower westbound. Nonetheless, its a pretty cool graph.

Well after all was said and done, I was extremely happy with my $3 purchase. This little app is a great tool for flying and any other activity you can think of. I recently took it to Halifax on vacation and used it a lot to find my way around downtown. It has the option of caching the map tiles (up to 250Mb of data) so that even if you lose your data connection or don’t have a data plan, you can still use the app. Just make sure to cache the maps you’re going to use before you head out into the world.

In terms of my flying, I need 0.4 more hours of hood time or sim time to complete my night rating. I really do love flying at night and have gotten used to the differences. It’s smoother and can be a lot prettier at night with all of the small towns and city lights you see along your route. Toronto was a beaming glow of orange in the distance that I could see from at least 50 NM away. Not bad at 4500′!

Does anyone out there use their iPhone while they fly? More specifically, do you use any GPS apps that you find particularly useful? Let me know in the comments. I’m eager to try new things out.

Elevation Profile
Speed Profile

What do you think of this post?
Awesome (0) Interesting (1) Useful (0) Boring (0) Sucks (0)

No Comments

From The Flight Deck

From The Flight Deck by Doug MorrisI recently purchased Doug Morris’ book From The Flight Deck from Chapters. Being someone who is already fairly fluent in the goings on in the aviation world, I didn’t know if the book would be a repeat of everything I already knew. Turns out that its full of tonnes of little tidbits of aviation knowledge. Doug takes you through a hypothetical flight from Toronto to Hong Kong and explains everything that happens at every stage of the flight.

The book is meant for curious passengers and aviation enthusiasts that want to know more about what goes on behind those closed (and now locked) flight deck doors. Being a student pilot, I found his youth similar to mine in some ways. I started flying when I was 19 years old and will graduate university in a recession looking for a job as a pilot. I hope to instruct but there’s no guarantee I’ll be able to get a job doing what I love.

So far, this book is an easy read that explains commercial aviation very well. I recommend it to anyone who is a frequent flyer or anyone who might want to expand their knowledge of this amazing industry.

What do you think of this post?
Awesome (0) Interesting (0) Useful (0) Boring (0) Sucks (0)

2 Comments

SR71 Break-Up

I came across an interesting story written by Bill Weaver, a military test pilot. He writes about a flight in which he was testing an SR71 Blackbird at 78,000′ and Mach 3.0+ when the aircraft broke apart. It’s an amazing story and I can’t imagine the wild ride he went through. Click here to read it.

What do you think of this post?
Awesome (0) Interesting (0) Useful (0) Boring (0) Sucks (0)

No Comments

The Galunggung Gliding Club

One of the most awesome displays of airmanship is the story of British Airways flight 009. Having found themselves flying through a volcanic ash cloud, all 4 engines on the BA 747 flamed out and the pilots found themselves gliding over the Indian Ocean. Read about the whole story here. Also, flight 009 was the focus of an episode of Mayday on the Discovery Channel, which is a personal favourite of mine. You can check out the show here. If you’re wondering what’s up with the title of this post…read the article!

What do you think of this post?
Awesome (2) Interesting (0) Useful (0) Boring (0) Sucks (0)

No Comments