Archive for category News

Canadian Licensing Stats

Every quarter, Canada’s governing aviation body (Transport Canada) publishes statistics on the number of licenses currently in force. They do a nice job of breaking down the stats by type of license, gender, age, student permits, newly issued, air traffic controllers, province and region, among others. I belong to the column of newly issued aeroplane private licenses, so I thought I would make a few graphs to illustrate the breakdown between a few different classes of data. All data is current as of June 2009.

To start, I thought I would compare the number of private (PPL), commercial (CPL), and airline transport (ATPL) licenses currently in force in Canada. As you can see from the chart below, the vast majority of aeroplane licenses issued in Canada are PPLs with about 27,000 in force. The next biggest chunk comes from the ATPL group with over 11,000 in force and finally the CPLs with 8,000.

Aeroplane Breakdown

No surprises here. The PPL is the least specialized license you can obtain in this group so naturally most of the weekend pilots and general aviation pilots will be included here. The CPL allows you to fly for hire, but there’s only so much you can do with it if you expect to move up to the airlines, so that’s probably why you see it at the bottom of the stack numbers-wise. The airline pilots and aspiring airline pilots hold the ATPLs and make up a good chunk of the total licenses issued at almost one quarter.

Next, I’ve included the same data but for helicopter licenses. You’ll notice that most of the licenses held in this class are by the CPLs. ATPLs make up the next biggest group while PPL helicopter licenses bring up the rear. I believe that helicopters are a little more expensive to operate and maintain than your average single engine airplane so perhaps that’s why we see a huge drop in PPL helicopter licenses in force.

Helicopter Breakdown

The next logical step would be to look at the split between male and female PPL, CPL, and ATPL aeroplane licenses. Before I looked at the numbers, I knew that there were less female pilots than males, but I was actually quite stunned when I saw the stats.

Gender Breakdown

I figured that the split would be more around 15-20% female, but the number is actually much lower at between 5-7%. In my experience, there have only ever been one or two female flight instructors at the schools I’ve been at and I think I’ve been on two commercial flights where the first officer was female. I have never seen a female captain before but I’m sure there are lots out there.

The final category I’ll look at is one of the more important categories for myself: age. Since I’m working towards my CPL and eventually my ATPL, I want to know when to expect airlines to hire. A big factor is the number of pilots that will retire in the near future. I know that we’re currently in a recession, but the economy will no doubt recover by the time I’m ready to start working as an instructor, so I’m not too worried. Here are the numbers (click to enlarge):

PPL by Age
CPL by Age
ATPL by Age

In the PPL category, most of the licenses are held by people under 30. Looking at the bell curve of numbers between 30 and 65, the peak comes at license holders aged 50-54 years old. It’s important to take into account generational bias here because this is exactly where the baby-boomers fall.

Moving onto the CPL category, we can see that the younger folks definitely rule the commercial licenses. Pilots under 40 hold the majority of the CPLs in force in Canada. There is a bit of a bump with the baby-boomers again at ages 50-54.

Finally, the ATPLs. This category is a little more constant towards the middle age groups. The most ATPLs are issued to pilots aged 35-39 where only very few are issued to pilots aged over 60. With stringent medical requirements, many pilots over the age of 50 are forced to retire as their bodies age. While I feel bad for these guys, it will eventually open doors for me. Looking at ATPLs aged over 50, we can see that there are 3,948 of them. This means that within the next 10-15 years, we’ll probably see most of these guys retire. In percentage terms, close to 36% of ATPLs will be retiring in the next decade, if not sooner. This is great news for aspiring airline pilots such as myself. Even if I can’t land a job in the airlines, the vacuum effect of these retirements combined with the hopeful upturn in the economy will create jobs at all levels of commercial aviation in Canada and around the world.

What do you think of this post?
Awesome (0) Interesting (0) Useful (0) Boring (0) Sucks (0)

, , , , , ,

1 Comment

100 Years Of Canadian Flight

Canadian pilots out there will know that today marks the 100th anniversary of flight in our country. Back in 1909, Alexander Graham Bell created a team called the Aerial Experiment Association (AEA) with the intentions of designing and flying an airplane. With $45,000 of funding from his wife, Mabel Bell, the team included some legendary names in aviation, including Casey Baldwin (Canadian), Glenn Curtiss (American), Doug McCurdy (Canadian), and Tom Selfridge (American).

On Feb. 23, 1909, Doug McCurdy piloted the Silver Dart and became the first person in the British Empire to fly an airplane. The flight took place on the frozen Bras d’Or Lake in Baddeck, Nova Scotia and lasted 90 seconds. Today in Baddeck, former astronaut Bjarni Tryggvason was scheduled to fly a replica Silver Dart, but the weather is suggesting something else. He test flew the aircraft last night and a few weeks ago in Hamilton as well, but heres hoping the actual centennial flight will get off the ground tomorrow.

Below are some pictures from 1909 and 2009.

What do you think of this post?
Awesome (0) Interesting (0) Useful (0) Boring (0) Sucks (0)

No Comments

Colgan 3407

(AP/David Duprey)

(AP/David Duprey)

Thursday night, a Continental (Colgan Air) Dash-8 Q400 on approach to Buffalo Niagara International went down in a NY neighbourhood. Initial reports are saying that there are no survivors and that there is at least one fatality on the ground, but it’s still too early to tell. News sites are saying that emergency crews have not been able to enter the crash area due to the intense heat from the crash, which has destroyed one home, and most likely caused damage to more of the area.

Here is the NTSB animation:

What do you think of this post?
Awesome (0) Interesting (0) Useful (0) Boring (0) Sucks (0)

No Comments

Happy Birthday B747

February 9th, 2009 marks the 40th anniversary of the Boeing 747’s first flight and the introduction of one of the world’s most recognizable jumbo jets. The distinctive hump is a surefire way to tell it apart from any other airliner. The 747 held the passenger capacity record for 37 years and still remains one of the largest passenger aircraft ever produced.

Here are a few interesting facts about the B747:
- 1500 built/produced
- 413 ton max takeoff weight
- Mach 0.92 max speed
- Approx. 500 seats depending on layout

For an excellent article from the BBC, click here.

Below is an interesting comparison between some of the world’s largest aircraft, including Howard Hughes’ Spruce Goose, an Airbus A380, an Antonov 225 Mriya, and a Boeing 747-400.

What do you think of this post?
Awesome (2) Interesting (1) Useful (0) Boring (0) Sucks (0)

No Comments

CYXU Becoming Class ‘C’

My home town of London, ON is officially being upgraded to class C airspace from our current D status. What does this mean for a student pilot? Well, it means I get get to brag to friends about operating in a class C, but it also means stricter guidelines and a mode C transponder, which I’m almost certain all of the airplanes at my school have. Better check on that. The change takes place 2 days after my birthday, Mar. 12, 2009 at 0901Z.

Here’s the official NavCanada memo:

CYXU Memo

Now if only we could do something about the language problem…

What do you think of this post?
Awesome (0) Interesting (0) Useful (0) Boring (0) Sucks (0)

No Comments

Flame Out

Ah, there’s nothing like the Hudson River in January. Luckily for the 150 passengers and 5 crew members on board US Airways flight 1549, they didn’t have to wait long when their flight ditched into the Hudson after a dual engine flame out. Shortly after take off from La Guardia, the Airbus A320 hit a flock of birds and both engines flamed out at an altitude of only 3200 feet. The pilot was given vectors to the west in an attempt to land at a nearby New Jersey airport, but decided against it in order to not risk crashing into a populated area. He managed to successfully ditch the aircraft into the Hudson where ferry boats started rescuing people immediately. Amazingly, all 155 people on board survived with only a few serious injuries.

Let me first start out with a very profound wow. As someone who studies aviation accidents on a regular basis, there are a number of things that amaze me about this story.

First and probably foremost, it is amazing that the plane didn’t break apart on impact. If the aircraft in question were a jet with high mounted engines, such as a Bombardier CRJ or maybe an MD88, then I would understand. But aircraft with engines mounted under the wings usually don’t do so well with water landings. I am reminded of Ethiopian Airlines 961 that landed in the India Ocean after running out of fuel. The Boeing 767 in question attempted to ditch, but the left engine dug into the water on impact and ripped the plane apart; 125 of 175 were killed. So the fact that the pilot managed to put the aircraft down softly enough to not rip the wings off is an impressive feat in itself.

I am also amazed that the plane didn’t start sinking right away. Maybe this goes hand in hand with a rough landing, but usually giant hunks of metal start to fill with water very quick and people don’t have enough time to escape. It seems that in this case, the fuselage was in good enough condition to allow everyone to pour out onto the wings and simply wait there until boats showed up to rescue them. If ever I saw such an organized emergency landing, it was this one.

And to be clear, this was not a crash landing. It was an emergency landing. There is a very important difference. Although you may be inclined to say that the pilot crashed into the river, he in fact landed on the river. The difference between a crash landing and an emergency landing is simple: the pilot in command. His quick thinking saved the lives of everyone on board and possibly of people on the ground had he chosen to try and fly over New Jersey to land at an airport.

As someone who wants to fly for a living, it’s pilots like this that really make you reflect on your training and make you ask yourself: “What would I have done?”. I bet that there are only a handful of pilots working for any given carrier that could have pulled this one off. I’m just glad it ended up the way it did.

Here is a powerpoint someone emailed me, so I can’t take credit for it. If you know who created it, let me know and I’ll put their name down. I’ve turned the slides into jpegs so they’re viewable online. Just click the first picture and you can cycle through them from there.


What do you think of this post?
Awesome (1) Interesting (0) Useful (0) Boring (0) Sucks (0)

2 Comments